On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:24:12AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > On 11 May 2012 09:11, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:08:47AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> On 11 May 2012 08:44, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: > >> > Any implications on the speed of iteration? > >> > > >> > >> Waiting on the benchmarks to run. When do they launch? > > > > I think 3am. > > > >> If anything, it should be faster since the FooIterators are now just > >> typedefs for MeshEntityIteratorsBase<Foo>, so one layer of function > >> calls has been removed. > > > > Let's hope so. There have been a few regressions lately, mostly as a > > result of more complex index mapping: > > What was the change in index mapping?
My mistake. I saw a variable I didn't recognize and assumed it was added when we first added support for parallel assembly/solve in 0.9.3. I looked more closely at it now and the only differences between 0.9.2 and 0.9.3 that should have any effect on this are: - Moving the implementation of the constructor for MeshEntity to .cpp and adding some more checks there - Changing the MeshConnectivity variable in MeshTopology from ** to *** I'll run a few tests and see if I can spot the regression. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
