On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:52:01PM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:32:27AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> On 20 August 2012 10:06, Joachim Berdal Haga <j...@simula.no> wrote: > >> > I get a compile error with missing "MatSetNearNullSpace", using PETSc > >> > 3.2p6 > >> > (the version that dorsal picks). > >> > > >> > >> Doral should be updated to PETSc 3.3 and SLEPc 3.3. > >> > >> Whether or not we support PETSc 3.2 is another question. I would > >> certainly advocate dropping support for PETSc 3.1. > > > > I think it depends on what can be easily packaged and which packages > > are available. > > > > Are there packages for PETSc 3.3? Ubuntu only seems to have 3.1, not > > even 3.2. > > No, there are packages for 3.2 in Debian but not 3.3. I can backport > the 3.2 packages to Ubuntu if we drop support for 3.1, but making > packages for 3.3 would be much harder.
So it sounds like it would be reasonable to drop support for 3.1 but definitely keep 3.2. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
