>> 1) What exactly is wrong with it? We have been through this before; it >> is useful, it is efficient, and it is no more convoluted than the >> standard assembler (in fact, the logic is the same for the most part). >> > > Your later point is why the symmetric/system assembler will/should be > merged - they are for a large part the same, but double the work when > changes are necessary.
Agreed - although SystemAssembler uses a different ordering/logic (same as the OpenMP assembler?) than the symmetric and standard assemblers, so we will have to decide which is preferred before merging. >> 2) Why not tell me if it's broken, so I can fix it, instead of removing it? > > It hasn't been removed. It doesn't follow the design pattern of the > other assemblers (or DOLFIN objects in general), which means it could > not inherit the AssemblerBase member functions. It needs someone to > fix it. Sure. I can fix it. But only if I know about it, and I only found out by accident. -j. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
