============= TASKS AND FEATURE REQUESTS #640: DERNIERES MODIFICATIONS ============= https://doliforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=640&atid=247&group_id=144
Modifié par : HENRY Florian <[email protected]> Date: 20/04/2013 17:10 (Europe/Paris) Champ | Enlevé | Ajouté ------------------------------------------------------------------ Completion (0-100%) | 0 | 100 ============= TASKS AND FEATURE REQUESTS #640: COPIE COMPLETE ============= Projet : Dolibarr ERP & CRM --- Détails --- Submitted on: 2012-12-13 Submitted by: Maxime Kohlhaas (atm-maxime) Last Modified On: 2013-04-20 Summary: Better deposit invoice management Artifact ID: 640 Description: Currently, the deposit invoice must be created manually, from scratch, and has no link to the order. I think that when creating an invoice from an order, next to the "deposit invoice" choice, we should have an input to enter an amount or a percent of the deposit. And then create an invoice with one line called "Deposit invoice regarding order XXX" and the amount entered or calculated. This will be faster and easier than a manual creation, and this will keep a link between an order and the deposit invoice. Therefore, I noticed that when adding the deposit invoice as a discount on the final invoice, the line is placed in first position. Is there a reason for this ? Please tell me if this is interesting and if there's no specific rule preventing from doing an automatic deposit invoice. Priority: 7 Open to Any Developer: Yes Subproject: Module Invoice customer Assigned to (multiple): HENRY Florian (fhenry) --- Etat --- Start Date: End Date: Completion (0-100%): 100 Status: Open Commentaires ************ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 03/08/2013 14:24:34 par: atm-maxime Ok, but I think that your case A is totally standard and can be done without any dev. This is not a deposit invoice, this is the final invoice with a first payment recorded, you're right. For case A, I understand that deposit can not be allowed and that's why I can see in 3.4 that the option is not available. But here the payment is not flagged as a deposit. That's why I want to create a deposit invoice, which combined with the option FACTURE_DEPOSITS_ARE_JUST_PAYMENTS can do what I need. For case B, I need a deposit invoice, whether I know the final amount / content of the lines or not. For this, wiki doc says to create the deposit invoice from scratch. I just want to reduce clicks and calculation, and add the link between the origin doc and the invoice. So if I put back the deposit option on the invoice creation and add an input next to this option, this seems to me to be the simplest way of doing this. The deposit must always have only one line saying "deposit for ..." (says the wiki). If the input is filled, the line amount is > 0, else 0 and the user changes it manually. What do you think ? So much to discuss about, luckily we will meet at the DevCamp :D ------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 03/08/2013 12:55:32 par: eldy Yes there is for the moment rule to prevent this. But may be there is some case this can be usefull. Before working on this we must be sure to find what are such case. Case A: If you need a deposit invoice that contains all lines of invoice, you probably don't need "deposit invoice" but instead a standard invoice with a first payment entered. Fro this case, we must not allow deposit invoice and ask instead to make invoice with a first payment. Case B: Deposit invoices are designed when you don't know what will be lines into invoices or final amount. You request is for case B ? If yes, this is what we can do: When you click on "create invoice", we first add a combo with formconfirm method with a checkbox * Do you want to build a standard or replacement invoice * Do you want to build a deposit of ______% If user choose choice 1, you arrive on current page to create invoice. If user choose choice 2, you arrive on a page like current one but lines are not filled, instead you have a line saying "deposit for order xxx" with amount that is x% of order. Benefit, compared to create from srcatch is not a lot but it is still better so why not. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 02/08/2013 14:05:02 par: atm-maxime Any comment on this function ? La liste des CC est vide La liste des dépendances est vide Aucun fichier attaché Pour des informations détaillées, suivez ce lien : https://doliforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=640&atid=247&group_id=144
_______________________________________________ Dolibarr-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
