----- Original Message -----
From: "Harikrishna Neerkaje" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
> As per the comparisons shown between various XML Object Models on your
site
> it appears that dom4j is the best available.
> If this is the case why is dom4j not being pushed in the JCP as a jsr
> instead of jdom.

Good question.

The JDOM JSR is essentially an attempt to use the JCP process to manage the
already existing JDOM open source project. So its not really an attempt to
put together a standard API for working with XML on the Java platform per
se - its just a 'process' for the JDOM project to manage itself.

e.g. noone from the DOM, dom4j or EXML worlds gets a voice on the JDOM JSR -
its just for the JDOM people & project only, so its not a 'Java platform
standard' like JAXP or JSP which take a cross section of experts from the
industry.


> What the java community needs is the best XML Object model as the standard
> one so that all developers can make use of it.
> Why are you not trying to get dom4j into the jcp process especially
> considering there is already a stable release out for dom4j and not so for
> jdom.
>
> I have nothing much for or against either. I would just like to see the
jcp
> adopt a fair process of picking the best possible object model for
adopting
> it into the standard java tree.

I totally agree.

Though I'm not sure if this will happen. There's already 4 APIs, DOM, dom4j,
EXML and JDOM. I'm not sure if it is gonna be possible (due to political &
religous reasons) to unite under a common, standard API. It would be nice
though!

For example the JAXM API could derive from it if there was a standard,
interface based API.

James


_______________________________________________
dom4j-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev

Reply via email to