SourceForge.net wrote:
>Bugs item #1156909, was opened at 2005-03-04 11:50
>
>
Is this fixed in CVS?
No, but you don't have this problem if you use Xerces as XML parser.
If so I'm quite tempted to run a CVS-version if
bugIDs: 1156909, 1088314, 1070309/1035511 are fixed in current source as
these are production-critical for my application.
I'll give you the status of these bugs, and as far as I know:
1156909: see above
1088314: no work has been performed on this issue yet
1070309: this should be OK for DocumentFactory, DOMDocumentFactory and QName, but perhaps other classes should be fixed as well... I didn't do a search yet on ThreadLocal usage in the dom4j sources.
1035511: things should be better without the ThreadLocal, but there can be other "leaks" like the cache in the Namespace class. This needs further investigation...
BTW:
Are the bugs listed at
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=16035&atid=116035 closed when
they are:
a) released in a new-version build (which I guess would include b) and
c) under :-) )
b) fixed and commited to CVS
c) b) + tested
?
c (and sometimes b)
regards,
Maarten
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball.
