Hi All,
We sucessfully use retroweaver to allow backward compatability so that the
source code is java5, with the class files can be compatale with an earlier
version 

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Paul Libbrecht
> Sent: 23 October 2006 22:41
> To: Richard Eckart
> Cc: dom4j-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [dom4j-dev] Is dom4j still maintained?
> 
> Richard,
> 
> I am not a main dom4j developer so really can't speak for it...
> But I believe an offer of anyone to help a start for a 2.0 
> would be good, e.g., as a submission within the bug-tracker...
> 
> 
> paul
> 
> Richard Eckart wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I see the problem, yet I believe that 1.6.1 is quite a 
> stable release  
> > of dom4j for those platforms and people that can't run Java 1.5.  
> > Additionally dom4j does not seem to be under active 
> development. So  
> > would you see a problem in freezing 1.6.1 as a stable 
> branch allowing  
> > only for potential bugfixes and start moving HEAD to Java 
> 1.5, which  
> > would mean that after a long time some work is put into the 
> project  
> > again?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > Am 23.10.2006 um 22:59 schrieb Paul Libbrecht:
> >
> >   
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> allow me my 2p here... "supporting java 1.5" would not be 
> a matter  
> >> of dom4j 1.5 it would be a full change in API, I think.
> >> The same topic has been discussed on the jdom mailing list, which  
> >> relies a bit more on collections and most have said... well...  
> >> maybe... but we need to support both.
> >> There are still folks, such as me, which wouldn't be 
> *able* to run  
> >> jdk 1.5. On the Mac, it means an OS upgrade, and I fear it's the  
> >> same on others.
> >>
> >> paul
> >>
> >>
> >> Maarten Coene wrote:
> >>     
> >>> dom4j is currently not being actively maintained. The 
> main reason  
> >>> is that I don't have the time to do it at the moment (and this  
> >>> won't change in the near future). It should be better if someone  
> >>> else did this job, but no-one has volunteered yet...
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>> From: Richard Eckart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> To: dom4j-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 1:27:35 AM
> >>> Subject: [dom4j-dev] Is dom4j still maintained?
> >>>
> >>> I wonder: is dom4j still maintained.
> >>> Is there any roadmap for a new release supporting Java 1.5?
> >>> If not: why? Is there a "better thing" now?
> >>>       
> >
> >
> > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web 
> services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to 
> make your job easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on 
> Apache Geronimo
> > 
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&;
dat=121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > dom4j-dev mailing list
> > dom4j-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev
> >
> >   
> 
> 



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
dom4j-dev mailing list
dom4j-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev

Reply via email to