3 issues
- the
current implementation in AbstractNode is protected, it would be useful to
make it public, and to put the getNodeName into the Node interface
- the
String[] in AbstractNode has incorrect values. I think that the values in NODE_TYPE_NAMES
should be
"Node", "Element", "Attribute",
"Text", "CDATA", "Entity", "", “Processing
Instruction",
"Comment", "Document", "Document Type","","","Namespace","Unknown"
- It
would be useful to have a Node.MAX_NODE_TYPE for sizing purposes
Mike Skells
|
