I would like to echo this sentiment. dom4j is a great package, and I would like to know that it is still a living effort.
-bryan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dom4j-dev digest, Vol 1 #287 - 2 msgs Send dom4j-dev mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of dom4j-dev digest..." Today's Topics: 1. dom4j still alive? (Dennis Sosnoski) 2. Re: dom4j still alive? (bob mcwhirter) --__--__-- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:56:14 -0800 From: Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: dom4j-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [dom4j-dev] dom4j still alive? I've been recommended dom4j to developers for the last year and a half, but I'm growing increasingly concerned about the lack of any follow-up since the 1.3 release. I pointed out a serious performance issue with the 1.3 release a year ago, and there've also been a number of other fixes in CVS. This doesn't help most users who just download the latest release, though. I'm having an increasingly hard time justifying dom4j as a solution when it goes more than a year between releases. James, if you're unable to do a maintenance release perhaps one of the other developers can do this? I think dom4j is an excellent document model and I'd hate to see it die through neglect of basic maintenance after all the work that's gone into it. - Dennis --__--__-- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:14:11 -0500 (EST) From: bob mcwhirter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: dom4j-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [dom4j-dev] dom4j still alive? For what it's worth, there are some 1.4 snapshots on ibiblio that lots of us are using, updated as late as 3-jan-2003. http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/dom4j/jars/ -bob On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > I've been recommended dom4j to developers for the last year and a half, > but I'm growing increasingly concerned about the lack of any follow-up > since the 1.3 release. I pointed out a serious performance issue with > the 1.3 release a year ago, and there've also been a number of other > fixes in CVS. This doesn't help most users who just download the latest > release, though. I'm having an increasingly hard time justifying dom4j > as a solution when it goes more than a year between releases. > > James, if you're unable to do a maintenance release perhaps one of the > other developers can do this? I think dom4j is an excellent document > model and I'd hate to see it die through neglect of basic maintenance > after all the work that's gone into it. --__--__-- _______________________________________________ dom4j-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev End of dom4j-dev Digest ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ dom4j-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev
