On the behalf of Jakob Jenkov, who writes:

        ---------------------

For some reason I cant send mail to the sourgeforge lists even though Im a
member. Something about my mail server not having a postmaster account.
Could you maybe send this one out?

Jakob Jenkov
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------

I say we give James a chance to answer whether dom4j is dead or not, then
think of alternatives.

 - Are there any other developers out there with rights to commit to the
sourgeforge dom4j cvs repository?

 - Could anyone else host the project? Being open source and all, we should
be allowed to develop some kind of "offspring" or just keep it going.


Jakob Jenkov

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dom4j-dev digest, Vol 1 #288 - 1 msg


Send dom4j-dev mailing list submissions to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dom4j-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. RE: dom4j-dev digest, Vol 1 #287 - 2 msgs (Bryan Thompson)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: "Bryan Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:38:08 -0500
Subject: [dom4j-dev] RE: dom4j-dev digest, Vol 1 #287 - 2 msgs

I would like to echo this sentiment.  dom4j is a great package, and I would
like to know that it is still a living effort.

-bryan

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dom4j-dev digest, Vol 1 #287 - 2 msgs


Send dom4j-dev mailing list submissions to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dom4j-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. dom4j still alive? (Dennis Sosnoski)
   2. Re: dom4j still alive? (bob mcwhirter)

-- __--__--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:56:14 -0800
From: Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dom4j-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [dom4j-dev] dom4j still alive?

I've been recommended dom4j to developers for the last year and a half,
but I'm growing increasingly concerned about the lack of any follow-up
since the 1.3 release. I pointed out a serious performance issue with
the 1.3 release a year ago, and there've also been a number of other
fixes in CVS. This doesn't help most users who just download the latest
release, though. I'm having an increasingly hard time justifying dom4j
as a solution when it goes more than a year between releases.

James, if you're unable to do a maintenance release perhaps one of the
other developers can do this? I think dom4j is an excellent document
model and I'd hate to see it die through neglect of basic maintenance
after all the work that's gone into it.

  - Dennis



-- __--__--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:14:11 -0500 (EST)
From: bob mcwhirter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: dom4j-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [dom4j-dev] dom4j still alive?


For what it's worth, there are some 1.4 snapshots on ibiblio
that lots of us are using, updated as late as 3-jan-2003.

        http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/dom4j/jars/

-bob


On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:

> I've been recommended dom4j to developers for the last year and a half,
> but I'm growing increasingly concerned about the lack of any follow-up
> since the 1.3 release. I pointed out a serious performance issue with
> the 1.3 release a year ago, and there've also been a number of other
> fixes in CVS. This doesn't help most users who just download the latest
> release, though. I'm having an increasingly hard time justifying dom4j
> as a solution when it goes more than a year between releases.
>
> James, if you're unable to do a maintenance release perhaps one of the
> other developers can do this? I think dom4j is an excellent document
> model and I'd hate to see it die through neglect of basic maintenance
> after all the work that's gone into it.




-- __--__--

_______________________________________________
dom4j-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev


End of dom4j-dev Digest



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
dom4j-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev


End of dom4j-dev Digest



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
dom4j-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev

Reply via email to