RE: [dom4j-dev] On Jaxen/dom4j relationship

[David Thielen]

Hi;   Any idea which version of jaxen we should be using with dom4j and where it is? The jaxen website only appears to have version 1.0 and it looks like dom4j requires 1.1.   ??? – thanks – dave     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maarten Coene Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 4:44 AM To: Paul R Brown; dom4j-dev@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [dom4j-dev] On Jaxen/dom4j relationship   Paul,   I think it's a good idea to move jaxens dom4j implementation to the dom4j project. I've suggested this some time ago on the jaxen mailling lists, but I didn't get much response.   Remark that since dom4j version 1.5, jaxen classes are no longer included in the dom4j-* jars.   regards, Maarten Paul R Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, All -- DOM4J and Jaxen have long had a circular dependency, and I hope I'm not alone in thinking that this is a bad thing. The topic of "what Jaxen version in dom4j" came up recently, and I've been personally bitten by the dom4j JAR containing a version of Jaxen that was incompatible with the Jaxen version that my code elsewhere was expecting but where dom4j's version was taking precedence... So, I would like to propose that we make dom4j depend honestly on Jaxen: 1) Jaxen is no longer bundled inside dom4j-*.jar 2) The Jaxen dom4j navigator moves inside the dom4j project. 3) dom4j explicitly calls out which version of Jaxen it depends on. Thoughts? -- Paul ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews o n hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ dom4j-dev mailing list dom4j-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!