Huh?
You may not realize it, this is shorter and easier than almost all other software licenses, free or otherwise. Count your blessings, show it to your lawyer, and don't try to ask for "alternative minimum requirements". The license is the license, like it or lump it, and there isn't much not to like. This one is fairly short and sweet. For heaven's sake, you could have to use the GPL or something. -Tom On Tue, 7 May 2002, Jonathan Schedler wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 10:46:21 -0700 > From: Jonathan Schedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [dom4j-user] Licensing > > I'm not a lawyer and I am having a hard time understanding the requirements of your >license. > > I am considering using the dom4j as a persistent store api for our commercial >product. Our tool is not a commercial XML parser or XSLT or browser. > > If I have to include all of the information included on your license.html page, then >I'm afraid our corporate lawyer will gag. Is there an existing example of the minimum >requirements you are looking for us to use. > > Thanks, > Jon > _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ dom4j-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-user
