But DOM4J still needs a parser. So the numbers may have been with the
JAXP stock parser for JDK1.4.1. I am interested in comparing the
performance of DOM4J under Xerces and FastParser.
Anyone else interested?
Later,
Dave
--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| David Lucas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Lucas Software Engineering, Inc. (740) 964-6248 Voice |
| Unix,Java,C++,CORBA,XML,EJB (614) 668-4020 Mobile |
| Middleware,Frameworks (888) 866-4728 Fax/Msg |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| GPS Location: 40.0150 deg Lat, -82.6378 deg Long |
| IMHC: "Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life." |
| IMHC: "I know where I am; I know where I'm going." <>< |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Notes: PGP Key Block=http://www.lse.com/~ddlucas/pgpblock.txt
IMHO="in my humble opinion" IMHC="in my humble conviction"
All trademarks above are those of their respective owners.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
dom4j-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-user
- [dom4j-user] Has someone tested this? Carlos Barroso
- RE: [dom4j-user] Has someone tested this? Jason Horman
- Re: [dom4j-user] Has someone tested this? David D. Lucas
- Re: [dom4j-user] Has someone tested this? David D. Lucas
- Re: [dom4j-user] Has someone tested this? David D. Lucas
- Re: [dom4j-user] Has someone tested this? David D. Lucas
- RE: [dom4j-user] Has someone tested this? David Hooker