I was going to do something along those lines, but I ended up using my own doctype and removing the namespace declaration. Everything is all pretty and namespaceless. I wouldn't mind switching the doctype to a standard xhtml doctype when I serialize. Is that possible? If not, do you know if there are implications as far as browsers go? XPATH really needs to have a definable default namespace, or xhtml doctype needs to not have a "fixed" namespace or something...
As for DOM4J, it might be nice to be able to set a default namespace for createElement in DocumentHelper and DocumentFactory. Just a thought. Thanks for the help, --Evan ----- Original Message ----- From: Edwin Dankert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 2:26 pm Subject: Re: [dom4j-user] Re: Something wrong with XPATH > You'll have to specify the namespace when creating your element. > > Have you tried something like this? > > Namespace html = Namespace.get( "html","http://www.w3.org/TR/REC- > html40");Element element = DocumentHelper.createElement( > QName.get( "table", html)); > > Regards, > Edwin > -- > http://www.edankert.com/ > ????¨¥??¢{(?*eºy?h? ?º.?h??®??¦±+h¤:0?Zv??????w?«fjG¬±?§?*.®Z > ~)^±« j?²?~)?°y°?? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ dom4j-user mailing list dom4j-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-user
