[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Marc Storck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> 189/8 and 190/8 allocated to LACNIC (JUN 2005). Removed from the bogon lists. >> >> > Marc, Thanks for your reply. I just caught that. Now I think that I > understand even less. From my interpretation, it should no longer be > restricted, but . . . . > > Have a great day and weekend. > > ed > For an interesting story about why the bogons list can sometimes affect the block way past its intended lifespan, check out this article: http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2006/7/3/211811/5310
If you're experiencing wonky routing issues in addition to glue record creation, this may give you an idea of how the situation has played out for others. Now I think there's more we can do from our end to help this out, as these blocks are yours now and should be able register nameservers. Just so everyone knows how this plays out I'll follow up here with what I find out. -andrewm _______________________________________________ domains-dev mailing list domains-dev@discuss.tucows.com http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-dev
