On 8/26/10 3:42 PM, Andre Massing wrote: > > I have already tried out building dolfin with dorsal, petsc (including mumps, > hypre etc., not petsccore) and openmpi from the macports > and it went through. The only principal obstacle I encountered was the fact > that macports installs the compilerwrappers with an "open" prefix, > resulting into openmpic++, openmpif90 etc. So I did a dirty symlink trick, > which we probably want to avoid. So is there a way telling the name of the > preferred compilerwrappers , via environment variables or such like to the > new shiny cmake buildsystem?
My concerns from a previous e-mail still remain. What do you get when you do openmpicxx --version? I get the following i686-apple-darwin10-g++-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664) Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ... And when I do openmpif90 --version, I get: GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.4.4 Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. I am not sure it is a great idea to build something like petsc and use two different gccs to do it. Harish _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dorsal Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dorsal More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
