On Thursday February 3 2011 15:33:47 Harish Narayanan wrote: > On 2/3/11 7:15 PM, Johannes Ring wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 03/02/11 17:50, Johan Hake wrote: > >>> On Thursday February 3 2011 07:28:39 Harish Narayanan wrote: > >>>> On 2/3/11 4:26 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >>>>> On 03/02/11 15:23, Harish Narayanan wrote: > >>>>>> On 1/27/11 11:14 AM, Harish Narayanan wrote: > >>>>>>> I think I will just wait for DOLFIN 0.9.10 before making the next > >>>>>>> Dorsal release, then. We now have the current results: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Fedora 13 [untested] > >>>>>>> Fedora 14 [untested] > >>>>>>> Gentoo Linux [untested] > >>>>>>> Ubuntu 10.04 LTS [64, stable - breaks on armadillo test] > >>>>>>> Ubuntu 10.10 [untested] > >>>>>>> openSUSE 11.3 [untested] > >>>>>>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 [untested] > >>>>>>> Debian GNU/Linux Unstable [64, dev - OK!] > >>>>>>> Debian GNU/Linux Testing [untested] > >>>>>>> Mac OS X 10.6 (with MacPorts) [64, dev - OK!] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any other results? I'd like to not install too many virtual > >>>>>> machines. ;) > >>>>> > >>>>> Have you updated to Swig 2.0? > >>>> > >>>> No, I have not gone down that road yet. I think that will require an > >>>> addition of Swig to all platforms, right? > >>> > >>> I am not aware of any platform that ship swig 2.0 as a standard. > >> > >> I that Fedora does. > > > > MacPorts has 2.0. > > I only now noticed this and tried it out; DOLFIN dev builds with Python > support on Mac OS X. Will everyone interested please try their favourite > platforms and update the following Google Doc? > > http://bit.ly/euPjQe > > Notes: > > 1. Please restrict your testing to development builds. > 2. If your platform's package manager doesn't give you Swig 2.0 support, > you (may) need to remove your installed Swig and add swig to the list of > packages in your platform file. Send a patch if you do this!
Just a note: We still do support SWIG < 2.0, meaning that if the platform do provide 1.3.40 but not swig 2.0 it should still work just fine! Also swig has bumped its version to 2.0.1 now. I would recommend using this release. Sorry for this late update... Johan > Thanks, > Harish > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dorsal > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dorsal > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dorsal Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dorsal More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
