On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:18:47PM -0700, Johan Hake wrote: > On Friday October 28 2011 10:16:06 Garth N. Wells wrote: > > On 28 October 2011 18:03, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'll make a release now. > > > > Done. > > Thanks! > > For the record. If you want to share the burden of releasing software speak > out. I guess this issue will be addressed in the suggested development model!
In the development model, it is the job of the release manager to make the releases (for stable releases), but I would be very greatful for some help when it's time to make beta3 or rc1. It would also be useful to get more testing of the release script (fenics-release availabe in the fenics-dev repo). It is mostly automated but some manual work is involved. Something that I forgot to add is version numbers for the different components. As a rule of thumb, we suggest that the same version number is always used for FEniCS, DOLFIN, FFC, UFL but not for FIAT, UFC, Instant But when I think of this now again, if we're serious about only fixing bugs in each series, then the releases shouldn't need to be coupled. Naively, FFC 1.0.i should work with UFL 1.0.j for any i, j (disregarding bugs), unless there are bugs that can only be fixed by breaking the interface between components. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dorsal Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dorsal More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
