Hmm. I am not sure. I guess that depends on how often one updates their sources for unstable builds on dorsal.
Harish On 10/22/12 9:20 AM, Anders Logg wrote: > Yes, but my assertion is that cost is smaller than needing to branch > the entire source tree. > > -- > Anders > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:15:56AM +0200, Harish Narayanan wrote: >> I mean the user pulling it via dorsal from fpo. They then have to get >> the entire tarball each time, right? (As opposed to tiny deltas via bzr). >> >> Harish >> >> >> On 10/22/12 9:14 AM, Anders Logg wrote: >>> How do you mean? The snapshot would be updated every 5 min by a >>> cronjob on fenicsproject.org. >>> >>>> And how would one update the snapshot, which I am assuming is a tarball >>>> created by bzr archive (or whatever the export command is)? >>>> >>>> Harish >>>> >>>> On 10/22/12 9:09 AM, Anders Logg wrote: >>>>> Would it be a good idea to store snapshots of the FEniCS packages on >>>>> the server for faster installation with Dorsal? The bzr cloning takes >>>>> forever. We could have a cronjob running on the server for pulling and >>>>> updating the snapshots every say 5 min. We are already pulling for the >>>>> buildbots. >>>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dorsal Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dorsal More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
