On Monday, 18 April 2022 20:26:36 BST Patrick Wigmore wrote: > If there isn't a suitable route to 192.168.0.0/24 on the VPN client > computer, then manually adding one temporarily might be a worthwhile > experiment.
Hmmm. I've been struggling to find the correct iptables command to do that. Should this be a direct route from 10.1.10.1 to 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.0.30 to 192.168.0.1. Also should the protocol be NAT? Whatever I've tried so far doesn't seem to show up when I list the current rules, so I've been unable to confirm or deny that this was the problem. > It seems you've got me hooked on this puzzle, Terry. I was only going > to write a few paragraphs here, to clarify my previous remarks! Sorry about that. :-) -- Terry Coles -- Next meeting: Online, Jitsi, Tuesday, 2022-05-03 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk New thread, don't hijack: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org