29.06.2013 01:10, Mateusz Viste пишет: > On 06/28/2013 09:42 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: >> Well, but you wanted to embed slirp anyway, and haven't >> started that yet. So maybe it would be the same cost to >> evaluate the embedding of slirp and the cost of embedding >> vde? :) > In fact, I don't think embedding slirp is a good thing anymore. Yes but we need to be realistic. We can embed slirp and clearly state that this is a temporary solution until someone (of qemu) not to push the package out of it. :)
> Anyway, embedding vdeslirp might be a good direction for DOSemu (from > what I have read it does at least as much as librouter do), but since > I am personally not interested in it, I will let other contributors > contribute in this direction. :) I see. :) Well if your code just works, then we can mark it as a temporary solution too... Trying to get everything right from the start, will lead us no where. But I would still encourage you to take a look into this: https://github.com/mwilliamson/vde/blob/master/vde-2/include/libvdeplug.h and this: http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=net/vde.c;h=2a619fbc813b3e2fe8b508f347348a6d115ab381;hb=HEAD to see how (seemingly) simple it is. > >> We can also package slirp separately and ask the user >> to install an extra package if he needs slirp. > This makes sense, too. Yes but not for the first start. We'll get no where if we try to do that from the beginning. I think it is better to get something to work than nothing at all. :) And this "something" should IMHO be embedding things. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dosemu-devel mailing list Dosemu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dosemu-devel
