Not a bad idea Ted, but we still have all the memory footprint issues. Andrew
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Neward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 06 June 2002 01:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor for devices > > > J#? :-) > > Ted Neward > {.NET || Java} Course Author & Instructor, DevelopMentor > (http://www.develop.com) > http://www.javageeks.com/tneward > http://www.clrgeeks.com/tneward > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Stopford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:40 AM > Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor for devices > > > > Hi, > > > > Yeah I have seen that, any clues folks on how well this > might port to .NET > ? > > > > Andrew > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Federico Raggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 05 June 2002 03:29 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor for devices > > > > > > > > > Note that there is also a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) > > > available for Lego > > > Mindstorms, called LejOS, at http://lejos.sourceforge.net. > > > > > > > > > Federico Raggi > > > Latam Developers Initiative Manager > > > Microsoft > > > > > > Phone: (954)489-4862 > > > Mobile: (954)465-4862 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Andrew Stopford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:13 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Rotor for devices > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Just to answer a few of these questions, slightly off > topic I hope > > > none of > > > > you mind :) > > > > > > > > I used the following web site > > > > > > > > http://graphics.stanford.edu/~kekoa/rcx/ > > > > > > > > > > The RCX is perhaps once of the most minimal devices around > > > > > with a low > > > > > amount > > > > > > of CPU and memory space to work with, from what has > been said so > > > far > > > > > getting > > > > > > Rotor to work on it would mean stripping down Rotor to a > > > > > large degree ? > > > > > > > > > > Does the RCX even have a hard drive, I don't think it does, > > > > > thus another > > > > > issue would > > > > > be the problems of not having virtual memory. > > > > > > > > No hard drive but on board 32K of RAM > > > > > > > > >CX have, I talked to the Lego guys a > > > > > long time ago > > > > > at Siggraph > > > > > when they first demo'd the Brick, and I know that had their > > > > > own Behavior > > > > > Description Language > > > > > to write the controllers of the Brick, but I also remember > > > > > you could do some > > > > > coding using VC6, > > > > > I am not sure about this though. > > > > > > > > > > Does the RCX use a Intel CPU ? > > > > > > > > Hitachi H8 microcontroller > > > > > > > > No idea where the IS might be for this controller. > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > >
