You are correct. Thanks for pointing this out.
-- Serge
-----Original Message-----
From: Brent E. Rector [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DOTNET] Partition II Metadata II spec Errata
22.1.15 Element Types used in Signatures
<snip>
ELEMENT_TYPE_PTR 0x0f Followed by <type> token
ELEMENT_TYPE_BYREF 0x10 Followed by <type> token
ELEMENT_TYPE_VALUETYPE 0x11 Followed by <type> token
ELEMENT_TYPE_CLASS 0x12 Followed by <type> token
<snip>
ELEMENT_TYPE_CMOD_REQD 0x1f Required modifier : followed by
a TypeDef or TypeRef token
ELEMENT_TYPE_CMOD_OPT 0x20 Optional modifier : followed by
a TypeDef or TypeRef token
ELEMENT_TYPE_VALUETYPE and ELEMENT_TYPE_CLASS are described
incorrectly in the above table. Both of these types are followed by a
TypeDef or TypeRef token like ELEMENT_TYPE_CMOD_REQD and
ELEMENT_TYPE_CMOD_OPT.
-- Brent Rector, .NET Wise Owl
Demeanor for .NET - an obfuscation utility
http://www.wiseowl.com/Products/Products.aspx
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
