Dave Serrano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> The next question, does anyone know of a way to union > permissions in the attribute? I noticed the > 'StrongNameIdentityPermission' has a method to union > permissions but this is not available in the > 'StrongNameIdentityPermissionAttribute' class. I'm not sure > it even makes sense but am thinking that I would like to > union my public key and the framework's so this exception > wouldn't be thrown. Does this make sense? I'm just thinking > out loud here but wouldn't it make sense to do the demand all > the way up the call stack or is the 'LinkDemand' sufficient > in everyone's mind? Better yet, can anyone think of a reason > why I wouldn't want to do this (grant permission to the framework)? I not 100% certain, but I *think* you can apply more than one instance of the attribute and the runtime will take the different declarations and union them together. I don't have time to check, but let us know what happens. HTH, Drew You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
