Who's decided its a bad thing? And why? With MC++, its the only way to do Web Forms.
>From: Brad Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: dotnet discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disable generation of code behind in IDE >Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:08:11 -0600 > >Richard Birkby wrote: > > > I know that Code-Behind is unnatural for classic-ASP developers due to >it's > > compile-first mentality, but has everyone but me decided it's a Bad >Idea?. > >I use code-behind sometimes, but it's not necessarily for "compile early" >behavior. You can always use helper classes. In fact, I'm not sure how >entirely necessary code-behind is for pages that limit themselves to >presentation. I guess it depends on how you like to code. > >Brad > >-- >Read my web log at http://www.quality.nu/dotnetguy/ > >You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or >subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. --------------------- Sam Gentile .NET Consultant Co-author: Wrox Visual C++ .NET: A primer for C++ developers BLOG: http://radio.weblogs.com/0105852/ http://www.project-inspiration.com/sgentile/DotNet.htm http://www.project-inspiration.com/sgentile/ --------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
