Check out http://www.gastix.net. Yet another N-tier example.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:12 PM Subject: Re: [DOTNET] .Net Application Architecture > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Simon DeMonfort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:16 AM > Subject: .Net Application Architecture > > > > There seems to be two different ways to architect a .Net web application. > I > > can either use .Net's OO features and build a glorious object model and > > sacrifice speed. If I do want speed then I must comprimise my OO design > > principals (ie. encapsulation) and pass my objects around as strings. What > > is everyone else doing ? Can anyone point to any good white papers on the > > subject. > > Objects arent inefficient per-se. Object creation and destruction can take > time, but strings are just objects themselves. > > I wouldnt do a glorious object model for the sake of it, checking off every > pattern in the GOF book, but I wouldnt seek performance over a maintainable > design. Better to get something working fast then profile it > > -steve > > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or > subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.