In theory - yes. Actually I could. Access is from the same process anyway :-)
What would be the managed representation of the handle? Regards Thomas Tomiczek THONA Consulting Ltd. (Microsoft MVP C#/.NET) -----Original Message----- From: Chris Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 23. April 2002 13:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Named Pipes for Remoting - thanks you (and a questio n about named pipes).... Can you use an anonymous pipe instead of a named one? I believe Win98 supports the creation of anonymous pipes Merak > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Tomiczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 April 2002 12:24 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Named Pipes for Remoting - thanks you (and a > question about named pipes).... > > > Yes, I came to this conclusion either. So remoting with pipes is not > available there.... > > I start to seriously hate the old OS versions. > > How can someone handle inter process communication on 98 then? > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
