Scott Densmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Well null would be ok.. But null logic with dates is a PITA > and I really don't want to go down that road since you could > have something (well in our case) that looks like this Instead of null use DateTime.MaxValue. Sure, you lose one 100 nanoseconds of time, but you avoid having to deal with the null concept. ;) Later, Drew You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
