Huh. We have win2k with sp2, installed dotnetfx with no problems. Then when we tried iewebcontrols.msi it just says that it was "interrupted" and exits it. So we turned IIS off, and all the other stuff we could find and still got the same results. So we tried the "manual" install of those controls and that's when it asked for the SDK.
Thanks, =Blain -----Original Message----- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Anderson Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Mildly OT ASP.Net Server question... I used dotnetfx to install the framework, and the iewebcontrols.msi to install the IE WebControls on a Win2k server box only a few weeks ago, with no problems gacutil only places the assembly in the global assembly cache for use by all sites Using the MSI version of the installation, I didn't need this SDK utility, and I just checked ..it's not on the server I installed it on Alternatively, use explorer to drop the file in the GAC (%WINDIR%\assembly) Merak > If you'll note on that page, you see the following: > "Presently, only WindowsR 2000, WindowsR XP, and WindowsR > .NET Server platforms with either the .NET Framework SDK or > Visual StudioR .NET can host the WebControls." > > When we try to run that with ONLY the .Net Framework > installed it just bombs out. We tried a manual install of it > and it is acting for a gcutil file which apparently only > comes in the SDK. Which is what is really adding to the > confusion for me I guess. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
