I'm curious...Does anyone know the technical reason you can't call a set accessor on a value returned from a get accessor? I can see the logic behind it since the the value is a temporary. Nevertheless it's all just syntax and it could have been permitted. In his book, Jeffrey Richter says only that it is for reasons best known to and understood by compiler writers. Is there a deep reason you hit when implementing the compiler?
Thanks Jon Jagger You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
