On Wed, 29 May 2002 09:41:38 -0700, Eric Gunnerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The compiler generated one (the overloaded operator) needs to be one >that isn't likely to collide with names that a user would choose. >Choosing "Add" for this would be a bad idea. At first I too thought it would be a bad idea. But on reflection I am not so sure. Methods are allowed to overload each other. Where is the harm? What is the worst that could happen if the compiler generated version was called Add? And would this be better or worse than having to add a forwarding friendly method for every operator? Cheers Jon Jagger You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
