Hi Noam, You are correct, of course. However sending-on-the-wire and local-database vrs. in-memory-Dataset are independant issues.
Thanks! Avi On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 07:26:51 -0700, Noam Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Avi, > >I think the main point in the in-memory dataset, is the ability to send it >across the wire. I can have a remote server, WebSerrvice or other type of >server create a recordset and transfer it to a client over http (through >the XML serialization). That client does not have to have access to my >database (i.e. accross a firewall). But the client can have all the >benifits of a record set (like binding to a control, sorting, etc.). > >That is where I see the main use or recordsets. One cool tool is the >ability to create a dataset class based on a table. You can then share this >class with the client, so you both have the same recordset class. > >Hope this helps, > >Noam > > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
