hmm in my ignorance and not actually able to remove my previous mail before looking uterly stupid, I was initializing the value of the hashtable in the default constructor!
Yes it would seem as though the hashtable is not serialised! bang goes my wonderfull idea. -----Original Message----- From: Morten Abrahamsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 7 June 2002 14:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] MSMQ XMLMessageFormatter BUG. Is the hashtable serializable ? Morty -----Original Message----- From: Rolls, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET] MSMQ XMLMessageFormatter BUG. Unfortunately there seems to be a bug when serialising a class into the body of an MSMQ message, when you have a public member of type hashtable as following class below shows - public class DeliveryJob { public Hashtable Properties = null; // Constructor public DeliveryJob() { Properties = new Hashtable(); Properties.Add( "ServerAddress", "10.32.54.115" ); } }; When sending an object of the DeliveryJob type to MSMQ you receive the following exception text ' There was an error reflecting 'MSMQTestApplication.DeliveryJob' It seems to only fail on using the public access modifier as if I remove public it works, it also works if I the internal access modifier. Does anybody know if MS are aware or if there's a fix to this problem. Regards Robert Rolls. **********************************************************************" This correspondence is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information or both. " No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any " mistransmission. If you receive this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended recipient. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of Vodafone. This email has been checked for viruses. ************************************************************************ ********************** You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. **********************************************************************" This correspondence is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information or both. " No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any " mistransmission. If you receive this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended recipient. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of Vodafone. This email has been checked for viruses. ********************************************************************************************** You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
