> It would seem as though if a class implements IDispose I have to call it as > soon as I've finished with the object. This seems more long winded with more > chance of being forgoten by the multitude of developers out there. would it > have not been easier for the actual clr to see what objects need to be > disposed when they go out of scope.
I think that's a hellava good idea, Robert. : ) --Chris You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
