Glad you got it to your satisfaction. You're welcome ! :-) On Oct 14, 2:48 pm, Rune Smedstuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you so much for your replies! > > I found one answer to the topic by implementing > getCurrentServerObject()-procedures. But then again, that was really > not what I was looking for. Your solution would absolutly be a more > desired approach to the "problem", so im opting for removing the > static keyword. Thanks again for taking the time to reply :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DotNetDevelopment, VB.NET, C# .NET, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, XML, XML Web Services,.NET Remoting" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/DotNetDevelopment
You may subscribe to group Feeds using a RSS Feed Reader to stay upto date using following url <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DotNetDevelopment";> http://feeds.feedburner.com/DotNetDevelopment</a> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
