You're welcome ! Glad you got it to your satisfaction.
On Oct 29, 12:21 am, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The solution I gave you earlier was one way to do it, though > > admittedly not a very good way. > > May not be a very good way to do it, but it fits my requirements > perfectly. The values read in are only read in once during the entire > process and as such, I just needed to get access to those values. The > front end on existing/working code is being replaced. > > Thank you Cereberus
