Couple of points to make : (this is for everyone who may be interested) 1. I do not moderate anyone unnecessarily (unless they have demonstrated suspicious behaviour). It is the rule of the Group that all new members are moderated until they make a certain minimum number of posts. (Before you ask, I do not know that number). This feature really really helps me keep the Spam away.
2. Creating a second thread doesn't really help in this case, because it still will not bypass the moderation queue. Your second thread will also be in the queue along with the previous post. It is better to post a reply to the previous message to keep everything in order. If the original post hasn't been approved yet, you would be best off writing a message with the same subject line (You better remember it exactly !) with a "Re: " prepended to it. If you use an email client for this, it would be pretty straightforward. 3. Steve, it was very considerate of you to post a quick message indicating that your problem was solved so that no one spends time trying to find a solution for it. Much appreciated ! 4. It was also very nice of you to post the solution as well. That shows a good community spirit and helps people who might (in future) be searching for the same thing and find this through a search engine. Too many people ask questions and never bother to give feedback or tell us in return what really helped them. They just ask and vanish. 5. I see the link got truncated while reposting Steve's message so here's the link again (TinyURL): http://tinyurl.com/yqsokg -- Cerebrus. Group Moderator. On Oct 29, 12:28 pm, Cerebrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve posted a "fixed" message in a separate thread so I'm moving it > here (and removing that thread): > > On Oct 29, 7:43 am, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- > Sorry for making a second post, I didn't want anyone to spend time > researching my resolved situation for me. > Unfortunately, Cerebrus still moderates all of my posts :( so rather > than wait, I decided to post a second topic to save anyone any > headaches. > > http://blogs.msdn.com/sburke/archive/2008/01/16/configuring-visual-st... > the above link fixed my problem. > > It is strange however, that so many checkboxes would change their > state when I clicked 'no', but whatever, it works now! > --- > > On Oct 29, 7:35 am, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi guys, I figured you would be able to help me here. > > > So I went to step into some line of code in Visual Studio 2008 that is > > part of a Microsoft Library (Console.Write for example) > > > It gave me a prompt asking if I accepted the agreement with > > Microsoft's terms of use. I wasn't expecting it, and I clicked 'no', > > lol. > > Instantly, I went 'DAH' and realized the blunder I had made. So I > > tried it again, expecting it to ask me again. But it doesn't, and now > > I cannot step into the Microsoft Libraries. > > > I tried 'resetting' my environment settings to no avail. > > > Does anyone have any ideas?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
