Let me know how to use the Cache, Application class, LINQ, and XML for
simpler data storage.

I have used the cache in my config file but also the site is very slow to
load

this is i have used in my project

<system.web>
<caching>
<outputCacheSettings>
<outputCacheProfiles>
<add name="profile" duration="60" enabled="true" varyByParam="*" />
</outputCacheProfiles>
</outputCacheSettings>
</caching>
</system.web>

In each web page ie: Content page
<%@ OutputCache Duration="60" CacheProfile="profile" %>

Whether the code is correct...?

Let me know is there any wrong..?





On 11/19/08, Brandon Betances <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Silly people still using ADO.NET <http://ado.net/> and querying the DB
> everytime they want to manipulate the data. Learn about the Cache,
> Application class, LINQ, and XML for simpler data storage.
>
> Also if you not using a webserver or local IIS, the VS Development Server
> is very slow.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Stephen Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Less is More is a design philosophy that few people understand.
>>
>> Are you doing any Select * from ..... for your data?
>>
>>
>>
>> .........................
>> Stephen Russell -
>> Senior Visual Studio Developer, DBA
>>
>> Memphis, TN
>> 901.246-0159
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Venkatu
>> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 11:11 PM
>> To: DotNetDevelopment, VB.NET <http://vb.net/>, C# .NET, 
>> ADO.NET<http://ado.net/>,
>> ASP.NET <http://asp.net/>, XML, XML Web
>> Services,.NET Remoting
>> Subject: [DotNetDevelopment] How to improve site speed ...
>>
>>
>> hi
>>
>> Good morning to all
>>
>> I have created a web project it working fine , but its slow,....
>>
>> so how shall i improve the speed of the site.. performance speed
>>
>> Let anyone suggest a solution.../
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.4/1790 - Release Date: 11/17/2008
>> 8:48 AM
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to