Mike - Perfect, then let us have those points added to the rules and regulations. Can we? Brandon - There are a lot of things documented. Are you telling me that only undocumented and unexplained queries have been answered by people in this group so far?
Do not read me wrong - I am not arguing FOR anybody here. Not at all. The point that I like to make clear is this - Do not make this a hostile environment with sarcastic comments and mockery. If you think the question is naive - better don't answer OR if you have the time, just put a word saying it is easily available at MSDN or elsewhere. And you are damn right - this is a Google group and that is the reason WE both are in it. Let us not use this place to vent our anger or pressure. I agree it would have been easier for him to have googled it. It would have been much easier for you to have ignored it too, if you found it so unimportant. On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Mike Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brandon Betances wrote: > >> That doesnt make up for incompetency. It would have been much easier for >> him go to google, type in northwind database, and pressa button than to go >> through the motions of posting a question on here. This should be a last >> resort, not a first. If we just had a bunch of people asking every well >> documented question that popped into their head, we would have quite a >> littered group. >> >> Oh wait, we do. After all, this is a "Google" group isnt it? >> > > Yup! There are too many newbies that discover the group and just fire off a > message without first having examined the archives to ascertain > > a) if their question has already been asked and answered > b) the level of intolerance for asking stupid questions > c) the level of information that they can expect to receive > > -- > Regards, > Mike Fry > Johannesburg. >
