Yes, I later realized that was the case. I went back to the site where I got the code, and there is nothing else but what I was proivded with. So I suppose it will need a little customization from myself...
On May 29, 4:29 am, hilariousastal <[email protected]> wrote: > yeah i think you should get back to the point from where you have > collected the code, seems like some code like a compiled dll is > missing of which it is referring to.
