Hey Andy,

I see you've been doing quite well for yourself. Congratulations! I've
been doing okay, as you can see, I'm still here and things haven't
changed much here. Dabbled on StackOverflow for a while and then got
kinda bored.

I am surprised to see you echo the very feelings I reserve for LiNQ to
XML. My impression of it is that it seems like a blessing for n00bs
who aren't familiar with the XML technologies (XPath, XSLT, XQuery,
etc.) and the .NET XML API. On the other hand, I have prided myself on
my proficiency in those domains and frankly did not find anything that
could beat my existing coding style.

On Aug 29, 7:18 pm, Andrew Badera <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey C, very long time no chit, no chat. How you been?
>
> Been mostly quite excellent here, thanks! Doing a few widely-varying
> projects right now, from analysis for an SaaS startup to some cool,
> kind of fun Twitter apps for a couple clients ... got quoted in
> PCWorld the other week re: the Twitter DDoS issues. Been doing the
> fully-independent consulting thing for about 3 months, rather than the
> fulltime+consulting I'd been doing for years. I love the freedom and
> flexibility -- especially the ability to walk my dog in the sun. I
> worry about generating leads :)
>
> Since last I was a member here, I've discovered that I don't dislike
> LINQ after all. I thought it was a muddling, middling abstraction that
> would degrade developer knowledge and capabilities, but I have come to
> fall in love with it. Well, LINQ to SQL at least -- it makes rapid,
> iterative development very feasible, without sacrificing, as far as
> I've seen, security or performance, nor developer knowledge as I'd
> feared. LINQ to XML on the other hand ... well, great for WRITING XML,
> but almost pointless, so far at least that I've seen, for READING XML
> -- I have to write the same XPath queries I would have written with
> more classic XML handling. That said, my LINQ knowledge has improved a
> lot since I last tried LINQ to XML, so maybe I ought to give it
> another look. I also need to explore the Entity stuff more.
>
> ∞ Andy Badera
> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
> ∞ Google me:http://www.google.com/search?q=(andrew+badera)+OR+(andy+badera)

Reply via email to