well, I think you have missinterpreted that :).Name of architecture is x86 for both 32 and 64b processor... It is true 64b has its own sub architecture (so called x86_64), but if you compile it as for 32b, it will work for both 32 and 64b processors.
2009/9/10 Andrew Badera <[email protected]> > > No need for dragging anything out of memory as far as that goes, NGen, > or Native Image Services, will actually produce a native image for you > ... the problem is, it's native to the platform. 32-bit and 64-bit > processors for instance will probably produce different images which > won't run on the other architecture. > > ∞ Andy Badera > ∞ +1 518-641-1280 > ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private > ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Processor Devil > <[email protected]> wrote: > > How to convert .NET related program into native binary: > > .exe file compiled by csc command (or gmcs on unix) is so called > mid-file. > > It doesn't take so much space and is fully compiled into machines code > while > > execution. That's it :). When you run that .exe file, the real machine > code > > is compiled and copied into memory where it is executed. So for obtaining > > exe you need just some serious debugger to run the file and which is able > to > > save the memory dump :) > > > > 2009/9/10 Andrew Badera <[email protected]> > >> > >> Interesting product, bookmarked for future consideration. > >> > >> ∞ Andy Badera > >> ∞ +1 518-641-1280 > >> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private > >> ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Brett Allen<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > http://www.xenocode.com/Products/Postbuild-for-NET/ > >> > > >> > Basically google for .NET Native compiling. > >> > > >> > Essentially all the assemblies the executable references have to be > >> > "statically compiled" against the executable. > >> > > >> > Making for a larger executable, but .NET independent. > >> > > >> > On Sep 9, 1:01 pm, Andrew Badera <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> .NET applications require the .NET framework. Client apps can use the > >> >> client-only subset framework, but one way or the other, .NET needs to > >> >> be installed. This has been a bigger issue than one might expect when > >> >> it comes to adopting .NET, or to moving on to the next version of the > >> >> framework. > >> >> > >> >> You might be able to hack something with ngen, but I'm pretty sure > the > >> >> output of ngen'g is machine-specific. (But maybe not, maybe it's > >> >> CPU-architecture specific ... ) > >> >> > >> >> ∞ Andy Badera > >> >> ∞ +1 518-641-1280 > >> >> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private > >> >> ∞ Google me:http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Sruthi<[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > >> >> > i just want to clarify my doubt... Is there any possiblity to run > my > >> >> > application in another system in which framework is not installed. > >> >> > As of my knowledge, to run a .net application we need to install > the > >> >> > framework.. > >> >> > My question is when i am installing my exe in another system, what > >> >> > should i do to run my application without installing the > framework... > >> >> > >> >> > I came across Thinstall.... can anyone of u tell me wat it is > >> >> > about... > >> >> > and how should i use that... > >> >> > >> >> > so tell me how to run the exe without installing framework- Hide > >> >> > quoted text - > >> >> > >> >> - Show quoted text - > >> > > > > > >
