My bad, I totally overlooked that code block. CancelAsync is BWT, right.

∞ Andy Badera
∞ +1 518-641-1280
∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera



On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Arsalan Tamiz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can't say for sure. I am assuming he is using backgroundworker control
> because he used "bwOverAll"
> bw = Background Worker
> ?
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Andrew Badera <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Arsalan,
>>
>> That's for BTW. The OP didn't specify BTW, I bet he's using classic
>> Thread.
>>
>> ∞ Andy Badera
>> ∞ +1 518-641-1280
>> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
>> ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Arsalan Tamiz <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Andrew is right that you haven't provided any details. But I would like
>> > to
>> > put some points for you,
>> > According to MSDN,
>> > -----------------
>> >
>> > CancelAsync submits a request to terminate the pending background
>> > operation
>> > and
>> >
>> > "sets the CancellationPending property to true."
>> >
>> > When you call CancelAsync, your worker method has an opportunity to stop
>> > its
>> > execution and exit.
>> >
>> > "The worker code should periodically check
>> > the CancellationPending property
>> > to see if it has been set to true."
>> >
>> > -----------------
>> >
>> > So its your responsibility to check the "CancellationPending" property.
>> > Are
>> > you checking it? If you are checking then see what statements are being
>> > executed before this "checking". Are those statements being hanged
>> > somewhere?
>> > Regards,
>> > Arsalan Tamiz
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Benj Nunez <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello everyone,
>> >>
>> >> I recently wrote a program that allows users to interrupt a process
>> >> which runs within a thread.
>> >> I have code that looks like this:
>> >>
>> >>        private void btnStop_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
>> >>        {
>> >>            bwOverAll.CancelAsync();
>> >>            btnStop.Enabled = false;
>> >>        }
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure if threads rely somewhat on what CPU the PC has. I have
>> >> tested my program to run
>> >> on the following PCs and I can start/stop threads at will with no
>> >> issues:
>> >>
>> >>  PC#1) Windows XP Home with SP3. Intel Pentium D 2.80Ghz, 504mb ram,
>> >> Hyperthreading enabled.
>> >>  PC#2) Windows XP Pro with SP3, Intel Pentium 4, 2GB ram,
>> >> Hyperthreading enabled.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On the production machine however, I checked its specifications to be
>> >> like this:
>> >>
>> >> PC#3) Windows XP Home, Intel Celeron.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> All three PCs have .net framework 3.5 installed.
>> >>
>> >> That's all I can remember. But I can check again about its ram and
>> >> clock speed.
>> >> Could you tell me exactly where to first look for in cases like this?
>> >> Normally I expect that
>> >> when I click the button to stop an action (threaded), there's a brief
>> >> delay then the thread eventually stops. But in my case it didn't.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Any advice?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Benj
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>
>

Reply via email to