Thanks. The main thing I want is that the ISP resolves problems they create quickly, i.e., less than 48 hours and when they say "I've escalated this and it should be fixed soon," that actually happens, wiht no excuses about what is required by IIS or ASP.NET, and without stupid choices, like a time two weeks ago when, in trying to solve the problem of my site not working, someone at the ISP deleted the entire main content directory.
On Apr 18, 8:36 am, "Keidrick Pettaway" <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been using godaddy for a while without any issues. It really depends on > what you need in terms of hosting ie bandwidth, databases etc. > Keidrick Pettaway > Web:http://www.kpettaway.com > Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/pub/keidrick-pettaway/8/705/b58 > > -----Original Message----- > From: OccasionalFlyer <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:31:10 > To: DotNetDevelopment, VB.NET, C# .NET, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, XML, XML Web > Services,.NET Remoting<[email protected]> > Subject: [DotNetDevelopment] Reliable ASP.NET ISP? > > Hi, > > This is not quite a technical topic but I need some advice. I'm > barely knowledgeable in ASP.NET, but I've been a software engineer for > a long time, so when the ISP that hosts a web site I'm the volunteer > admin for, but cannot make basic things work since a server migration, > it's time to change. It's been four days since the site went down and > all I get is a 403, not authorized, at the IIS level. They don't know > what wrong, can't tell me when it might be fixed, etc. This is the > latest in a string of pathetic performance, so I need to know where to > move my site to that has ASP.NET 3.5 running. It does need to be on > the less expensive side (it's not a business but a scholarly > organization) but I've got to get something more reliable than what we > have now. Thanks for any suggestions. > > -- > Subscription > settings:http://groups.google.com/group/dotnetdevelopment/subscribe?hl=en
