Hello,
For a while I though you left in panic... now I see you are bit more
serious. Look, I'm still seeing a function inside of another, and you
can do something like that with anon methods (or lambda expressions).
Now, you can always have a private function do the stuff... Ok it's
ASP.NET, so you can put the code you need to call in the folder
App_Code or in... a Web Service... or in your code behind code file
generated by the designer (if any).
In my attempt to read your mind, I think that some_var has something
to do with "some Database stuff", ok, now, if you are passing pure SQL
(in a string) to the database, then what you will do is convert that
some_var and append it to the string you'll pass. Note that for
complex queries a string builder is a good thing.
For example: string query = "SELECT * FROM SomeTable WHERE ID = " +
some_var.toString();
I think you get the idea. You can use string.Format too: string query
= string.Format("SELECT * FROM SomeTable WHERE ID = {0}",
some_var.toString());
Did I hit anything of what you have in mind? I'm not helping futher
with no more info.
Now may be I overlooked at your "*" because it's pseudocode... just in
case that can't be part of an indentifier (a name for a variable or a
function). By the way you are "openning" database and closing
databe :P
Theraot
On 18 mayo, 10:57, Awais <[email protected]> wrote:
> lol, i'm getting funny replys . yes im newbie to asp.net. :(
> i made a one change, now please tell me is this possible? will my function
> my_function_call work correctly.
>
> protected void btsignup_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
> {
>
> if (Page.IsValid)
> {
> database open
>
> //some DataBase stuff (here i want to use *Insert
> Query*)
>
> *my_function_call*( some_var); //my change
>
> databe close //my change
>
> public void *my_function_call*(string some_var)
> {
> database open
>
> //some DataBase stuff (here i want to use *Select
> Query*)
>
> databe close
>
> }
> }
>
>
>
> }
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Theraot <[email protected]> wrote:
> > May be you want to see something about anon methods:
> >http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0yw3tz5k(VS.80).aspx
> > Lambda Expressions:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397687.aspx
> > And LINQ:http://msdn.microsoft.com/es-es/library/bb397965(VS.90).aspx
>
> > Just because If I understand your pseudocode you have a function
> > inside of another, and that's the part that requires more chemical
> > synapse in newbies brains.
>
> > Now is it possible, yes, you just did it! You posted that here.
> > Now if "achive" is "archive" then don't worry, google groups have this
> > thread already archived in their server >.<.
> > And last, alternative solutions... there are a couple from ask better
> > to pay me passing through finding something else to do, and of course
> > you can always suicide.
>
> > Is just my idead or awais is feeling too shame :P
>
> > Theraot.
>
> > On 16 mayo, 03:32, Awais <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Is it possible or how can i achive this? or tell me plz alternative
> > > solution. Thanks in advance.
>
> > > protected void btsignup_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
> > > {
>
> > > if (Page.IsValid)
> > > {
> > > database open
>
> > > //some DataBase stuff (here i want to use
> > *Insert
> > > Query*)
>
> > > databe close
>
> > > *my_function_call*( some_var);
>
> > > public void *my_function_call*(string some_var)
> > > {
> > > database open
>
> > > //some DataBase stuff (here i want to use
> > *Select
> > > Query*)
>
> > > databe close
>
> > > }
> > > }
>
> > > }
