hi its working on local ..and also i checked by having 500 rows on your
Datatable , and use select whether you getting the value or not .. for me
the dr shows 0

I checked on local ie: if the data in the Datatable has limited record i:
340 or something , i am getting the value at dr  but if there is more than
800 records  the dr shows 0 value..

I do no why ?

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Raghupathi Kamuni <[email protected]>wrote:

> I used your code to create products dropdown from northwind database, it
> works fine for me
>
> http://dotnetdevelopment.pastebin.com/BGFVEZhc
>
> Did you define the columns of *Options_DataTable* ?
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Troy International 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi , Thanks for your info..
>>
>> I am working with .net 2.0 so how to resolve this issue.ie:
>>
>> you can check my issue here.. in detail.
>>
>> http://forums.asp.net/t/1524963.aspx
>>
>> Any idea..
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Raghupathi Kamuni <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ddperf/archive/2008/04/28/visual-studio-2008-performance-still-room-for-improvement.aspx
>>>
>>> *Excerpts From the above link*
>>> =======================
>>>
>>> *Question*
>>> Couple more that come to mind (although again, I can only verify it's in
>>> 2005 and has been around for several versions);
>>>
>>> 1. The dreaded "Function evaluation disabled because a previous function
>>> evaluation timed out. You must continue execution to reenable function
>>> evaluation" debugger error. I currently get this on a small WinForms app I
>>> run every time an exception gets hit, so I have to kill program execution,
>>> put a try/catch around it that dumps out hte stack trace, and then re-run
>>> because the debugger is effectively dead at this point. I've gotten this
>>> before on other projects; once the IDE starts doing this, it doesn't stop
>>> and in fact gets worse and worse, even after rebooting the machien.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Reply*:
>>>
>>> In VS2005 (and earlier) the main cause of functions timing out in the
>>> debugger was thread switching (which could be triggered by something as
>>> simple as accessing a WinForms property in the wrong context).  Since all
>>> other threads were stopped, the system would hang until it timed out.  In
>>> VS2008 we eliminated this issue by hooking thread switching calls (when in
>>> debugger expression evaluation) and failing them immediately.  So the
>>> likelihood that you'll encounter that particular problem should be
>>> substantially reduced.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately most applications, including VS, deal poorly with slow /
>>> unreliable network connections.  For now, the best you can do is either fix
>>> the lag or disconnect entirely from the network (both of which have their
>>> issues).  Long term, we need to do a better job of designing applications to
>>> deal with the wide ranges of network performance.
>>>
>>> David Berg
>>> Developer Division Performance Engineering Team
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Venkatu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  have this code
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  DataRow[] dr;
>>>>  dr = dt.Select("stepid = '1' AND placeid = " +
>>>> Convert.ToInt32(h1.Value));
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so dt -- contains so many Rows from that i am going to filtering the
>>>> data and add that row to the another DT - Finally bind the Dt to the
>>>> Dropdownlist .
>>>>
>>>> Could anyone tell how to resolve this issue ?
>>>>
>>>> But it shows error :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ************** Exception Text **************
>>>> System.Exception: Function evaluation disabled because a previous
>>>> function evaluation timed out. You must continue execution to reenable
>>>> function evaluation.
>>>>   at
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft.VisualStudio.DebuggerVisualizers.DebugViewerShim.PrivateCallback.MaybeDeserializeAndThrowException(Byte[]
>>>> data)
>>>>   at
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft.VisualStudio.DebuggerVisualizers.DebugViewerShim.ManagedShim.DelegatedHost.CreateViewer(IntPtr
>>>> hwnd, HostServicesHelper hsh, SafeProxyWrapper proxy)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to