@Gunawan: Funny statement coming from someone with two links in their signature. <sarcasm>Thx for the insightful response. mate</sarcasm>
@Cerebus: That is EXACTLY why I posted it. However I have received zero response so far. I am left to assume my thought on data providers and ado.net are correct. Do most .netters only concern themselves with the classes that are called ado.net(DataTable, DataSet) and forget or ignore the data provider classes Command, Connection, DataReader? On Aug 6, 4:26 am, Cerebrus <[email protected]> wrote: > I must admit, the thought did occur to me when deciding whether to > approve this post during moderation. For those who don't understand, > we don't allow self-advertising in this Group. (Self gratification is > not discouraged, however! :P) > > I then proceeded to carefully read the blog post. Consequently, I came > to the conclusion that it was an attempt by an erstwhile Java/PHP > developer to further his own understanding of the high level hierarchy > of data providers by putting his thoughts into words. Also, it would > be natural for a person new to this technology to look for > confirmation that his/her understanding of the subject is correct. > > This was the reason I allowed the post. I do not mind hearing anyone > else's thoughts on this matter. > > -- > Cerebrus. > Group Moderator. > > On Aug 6, 10:01 am, Gunawan Hadikusumo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Is this an attempt to get traffic of your web site , Mate ? > > > -- > > johnhadikusumo.blogspot.comwww.miniadverts.com.au
