You would never restrict a user to login into the system second time, you
just inform that you are already logged in using another session. The
banking product which I worked used to show the second login UI in a
different shade of colour.




On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:09 PM, David McKenzie <[email protected]>wrote:

> In addition, what happens if the user's browser encounters an exception or
> stops responding and needs to be forced shut?
> That user would attempt to log in again but would get the error message
> stating that they are already logged in (until the session expires).
> So when a login attempt is made, perhaps there would be a way to verify if
> a connection is still open/being used?  or perhaps there is something in the
> ssl that could be utilized?  If it is for a banking domain, I assume that
> any web/intranet would be using https..
>
> My two cents..
>
> ~ David J. McKenzie
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Stephen Russell <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:07 PM, VB <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Well its not the university assignment...:)
>> > Its the application for Banking Domain, in which user can logged-in
>> > only on one machine ...not more than one machine., So nobody can share
>> > thier user-id or password and work on one machine at a time....its
>> > very strange that some of you ppl didn't hear about this... :(
>> > anyway ...keep posting
>> --------------
>>
>> Sure, wink wink wink, its a banking rule.
>>
>> If that is the case all you need is to add a column in the user table
>> indicating LoggedOn status.  make it whatever data type you like.
>> Just reference it at login process.  If that column has the value that
>> states they are already in toss back the string "How DARE YOU attempt
>> to log in a second time"  Well you could change it to whatever mgmt
>> wants.
>>
>> I guess you need a way to clear that flag if the user didn't log out.
>>
>> YMMV
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stephen Russell
>>
>> Sr. Production Systems Programmer
>> CIMSgts
>>
>> 901.246-0159 cell
>>
>
>

Reply via email to