>> Thanks for the tips, it the third solution that I choose. > > Great, this is the solution we will use in the end.
I have made some progress in the live DDL building process. I have now an iso of about 800 Mo with 53 DDL packages built. I have removed for testing : - lxsession-lite (replaced by lxsession) - apertium-dbus (removed for testing) - lxpanel (removed for testing) - pcmanfm (removed for testing) >> I use a fresh squeeze installation in a VirtualBox. > > Alright, this may increase the build time a bit due to slower disk access. Yhanks for this advice. >> I have corrected all needed files for DDL squeeze (LH 1.x -> LB 2.x). > > Good job! Please request for joining our team on Gna then put these files > onto the experimental branch, say “live/experimental/squeeze/”. The branch live/experimental/squeeze/ will be create soon. >> DDL Live parts build with just some dependencies fixes (removed and >> added) > > Please post a diff to let me know what changes occurred ;). Or start by > copying the trunk tree into experimental so that SVN will do the diff for you > and me. I need some experiment of SVN, and upload experimental tree. >> I have made a backup with for experimental. >> For now the packages needing some fixes are lxsession-lite (seem to >> be >> replaced by lxsession) and apartium-dbus (dev dependencie to fix) >> I just removed for testing purpose. > > I have a netbook at home which I recently migrated from Lenny to Squeeze. I > noticed the change in lxsession. I also noticed that lxlauncher now has > different naming for its configuration file “launcher.menu”. Note that > lxlauncher is patched in DDL to allow users specify their own menu file. The > patch certainly needs to be ported to this new version. Well, deeper analysis will be needed to make the squeeze port. Not so simple. >> I have to made the packages loccaly and the add them to the live >> building process in local packages folder. > > You're right, our Debian repository only declares packages for Lenny. We need > to list which packages can be safely moved to Squeeze as is, which ones need > porting DDL patches to their official Squeeze version, which ones can be > removed from our repository since the Squeeze version can have solved our > issues. - 53 packages seems okay - 3 need analysis - 1 may be replaced/removed >> The problem with pysycache was that I use a VB mount points and a >> symlink cannot be done on thi filesystem. >> >> Pysycache successfully compile now. > > Cool :). And it work also. >> I will make a greater working partition for compilation need. > > I have a dedicated partition for package caching (2 GB), expect the building > process to require the size of the ISO file plus an uncompressed version of > its filesystem (~ 2GB), then add extra space if you want to store some CD's. > Note also that RAM free space plays a role in the building process duration > since files can be cached in RAM (or not!) for the deb files, the ISO > filesystem and the final ISO file… If you want everything in RAM, well, > should need around 3 GB! I have made a partition of 16 Go, and made backup on my host. I still have to fix : - apartium (apartium-udev complain about apartium not found) - apartium is not found in config/chroot_local-hooks/20-set-dash-shell.sh - grub splash screen is not translated - login session are not translated - application are in english (DDL packages were built in "all" and live DDL was built in "fr") Amicalement, -- Un arc-en-ciel ça n'existe pas ! Et pourtant tout le monde en a déjà vu... (Albert Jacquart) _______________________________________________ Doudoulinux-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/doudoulinux-dev
