On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:28:54PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 27.3.2007, at 3.35, Steven F Siirila wrote: > > >>The problem with this is that it would require adding asynchronous > >>DNS > >>library to Dovecot, or alternatively hoping that your DNS server is > >>never down (and hanging when it is). I don't really want to implement > >>the latter, and adding async DNS library just for proxying which > >>is used > >>by very few people seems a bit bloaty. > > > >If we require SSL/TLS connections, are we not always "proxying" > >connections? > >if that is true, and most folks require SSL/TLS (is that not the > >case??), > >then wouldn't most folks then be used by lots of people?
Of course I meant "then wouldn't most folks be proxying?" > And how many people are proxying SSL/TLS connections to different > computers? I don't know about that, but what I'm asking is.. how many people are allowing IMAP/POP3 connections (with authentication via user/pw) over non-secure (non-SSL/TLS) connections? I wouldn't think there would be many nowadays, and that there would be less as time passes. If that assumption is true, then I would think proxying would be very common (at least within a host where the imap-login and imap processes are paired together doing SSL/TLS). -- Steven F. Siirila Office: Lind Hall, Room 130B Internet Services E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office of Information Technology Voice: (612) 626-0244 University of Minnesota Fax: (612) 626-7593
